What will justice kennedy do

Basing his ruling on the apparent consensus in state law and international law, as well as psychological evidence in support of the contention that minors do not possess the full faculties to appreciate the gravity of their decisions, Justice Kennedy held that the evolving standards of decency dicta in the Eighth Amendment's jurisprudence no longer permitted the execution of criminal minor defendants.

Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion for the case of Lawrence v. Texas, a case where two men were charged with sodomy for having consensual same-sex intercourse. Kennedy found the statute involved in the arrest of the men to be unfairly applied to same-sex couples. He pointed to cases wherein other states have anti-sodomy laws that show no signs of being enforced on consenting adults in private. He wrote:. Kennedy closed his opinion by saying that the State has no justifiable interest in the intrusion on private activities of two consenting adults.

The case challenged revisions made by the Pennsylvania legislature in and in to the state's abortion law. The law required a woman wishing to terminate her pregnancy to provide informed consent and to complete a hour waiting period prior to the procedure.

A minor seeking an abortion was required the provide the consent of at least one parent, though the law had a procedure for a judicial bypass of this requirement. A married woman seeking an abortion had to document that she notified her husband of her intention to abort the fetus.

A legal challenge to these provisions was prompted by several groups. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld each of the provisions except for the requirement that a married woman notify her husband of her intent to obtain an abortion. In announcing the judgment of the court, Justice Kennedy, along with Justices O'Connor and Souter, affirmed the central holding of Roe v.

Wade —that a woman had a constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy—but upheld the majority of Pennsylvania's requirements. The court adopted a new standard for determining the validity of statutory regulations of abortions. This standard, which is sometimes called the undue burden standard, considers whether a state law or regulation places an undue burden on a woman's constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy.

In the text of the opinion, an undue burden was defined as a "substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability. The provision had also been struck down by the Third Circuit below. The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Anthony Kennedy Supreme Court.

These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles. Anthony Kennedy - Google News. Johnson, Jr. Ballotpedia features , encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers. Click here to contact our editorial staff, and click here to report an error.

Click here to contact us for media inquiries, and please donate here to support our continued expansion. Share this page Follow Ballotpedia.

What's on your ballot? Jump to: navigation , search. United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Hodges , U. FEC , U. The anticorruption interest is not sufficient to displace the speech here in question. Indeed, 26 States do not restrict independent expenditures by for-profit corporations. The Government does not claim that these expenditures have corrupted the political process in those States.

This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.

Simmons , U. Texas , U. In those States where sodomy is still proscribed, whether for same-sex or heterosexual conduct, there is a pattern of nonenforcement with respect to consenting adults acting in private. Essential holding of Roe v. Casey , U. Penguin Books. Pages Page Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.

Texas," accessed June 13, Voter information What's on my ballot? Where do I vote? The possibility of Collins and Murkowski defecting is not lost on their fellow Republicans. Senator John Thune of South Dakota urged the administration to find someone palatable for the two senators. Abigail Tracy is a national political reporter at Vanity Fair. Retired Justice John Paul Stevens, who left the bench eight years ago, has opted to use his time not on the bench but as a writer and public speaker on legal topics.

He has written two books about his judicial experience and about ways in which he believes the Constitution should be amended. In March, he wrote a newspaper opinion column promoting his idea that the Second Amendment protection of gun rights should be repealed as a means of gun control.

Now 98 years old, Stevens appears to remain in good health. When Justice Kennedy completes his service on the Court Tuesday, he will perform no further duties in that capacity. Anything now on his desk will be passed to another Justice to handle. He will continue to have the assistance of a law clerk and will have chambers at the Court if he wishes. He was a member of the federal appeals court for that Circuit before President Ronald Reagan named him to the Supreme Court in February On the Court, he took the seat formerly held by Justice Lewis F.

Powell, Jr. Kennedy was actually the third choice to succeed Powell. Ginsburg, who withdrew his name after a controversy arose over reports of his use of marijuana as a college student and as a young college professor.

He is still serving on the federal appeals court judge in Washington. Kavanaugh, as the successor.